+4 marks−1 if incorrectMatch the followingPrevious-year question
How do ligand field strength and metal d-electron configuration determine the geometry and magnetic moment of 4-coordinate complexes?
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II [ LIST-I (Complex/Species) LIST-II (Shape & magnetic moment); [ A. [Ni(CO)_4]; B. [Ni(CN)_4]^(2-); C. [NiCl_4]^(2-); D. [MnBr_4]^(2-) ] [ I. Tetrahedral, 2.8BM; II. Square planar, 0BM; III. Tetrahedral, 0BM; IV. Tetrahedral, 5.9BM ]; ] Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Your answer stays private
What feels right?
Hint 1 of 3
What are the oxidation states and d-electron configurations of the central metal ions in [Ni(CO)4] and [Ni(CN)4]2-?
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
Step-by-step solutionView
Correct answer
Determine the oxidation state and d-electron configuration of each central metal ion, pair electrons if strong-field ligands force pairing, and deduce geometry and unpaired electrons: [Ni(CO)4] is tetrahedral (0 BM, III), [Ni(CN)4]2- is square planar (0 BM, II), [NiCl4]2- is tetrahedral (2.8 BM, I), and [MnBr4]2- is tetrahedral (5.9 BM, IV).
Option analysis
Why each option works or fails
A · A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
Treating [Ni(CN)4]2- as tetrahedral with high spin or confusing the strong-field pairing behavior of cyanide with weak-field halide behavior. Recall that CN- is a strong-field ligand causing d-electron pairing in Ni(II) (d8), leaving one empty d-orbital for dsp2 square planar hybridization with 0 unpaired electrons.
B · A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
Failing to account for the zero oxidation state of Ni in [Ni(CO)4] and the migration of 4s electrons to the 3d subshell due to strong-field CO. Ni in [Ni(CO)4] is Ni(0) with configuration 3d8 4s2; strong CO ligands force pairing into 3d10, using 4s and 4p for sp3 tetrahedral hybridization (0 BM).
C · A-III, B-II, C-I, D-IV
This option correctly correlates the oxidation state, ligand field strength, hybridization, geometry, and spin-only magnetic moment for all four coordination complexes. Correctly matches: A with III ([Ni(CO)4] is sp3, tetrahedral, 0 BM), B with II ([Ni(CN)4]2- is dsp2, square planar, 0 BM), C with I ([NiCl4]2- is sp3, tetrahedral, 2 unpaired electrons, 2.8 BM), and D with IV ([MnBr4]2- is sp3, tetrahedral, 5 unpaired electrons, 5.9 BM).
D · A-IV, B-I, C-III, D-II
Assigning the maximum unpaired electrons (5.9 BM) to [Ni(CO)4] instead of [MnBr4]2-, ignoring the d-electron count of Mn(II) versus Ni(0). Mn(II) in [MnBr4]2- has a 3d5 configuration with weak-field Br- ligands, giving 5 unpaired electrons (sqrt(35) approx 5.9 BM).
Reviewed route
Solution
StepWorking
01Concept
For 4-coordinate complexes: Determine oxidation state, d-electron configuration, and effect of ligand field strength (strong field ligands like CO,CN− cause pairing; weak field ligands like Cl−,Br− do not). Magnetic moment μ=n(n+2) BM, where n is the number of unpaired electrons.
02Option verdict
Matches B with IV and C with II, which wrongly assigns high-spin tetrahedral geometry with 5 unpaired electrons to [Ni(CN)4]2−.
03Option verdict
Matches A with I, wrongly treating [Ni(CO)4] as paramagnetic with 2 unpaired electrons instead of pairing 4s2 into 3d8 to form a 3d10 diamagnetic complex.
Why is [Ni(CO)4] tetrahedral when CO is a strong field ligand?
In [Ni(CO)4], nickel is in the 0 oxidation state (3d84s2). Strong field CO forces the two 4s electrons into the 3d subshell, completely filling it (3d10). With all 3d orbitals full, inner d-orbitals are unavailable for dsp2, forcing sp3 hybridization (tetrahedral).