Converting a Quotient of Complex Numbers into Polar Form
What feels right?
What is the polar form of the numerator, ?
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
What is the polar form of the numerator, ?
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
Correct answer
Option analysis
Factoring an extra factor of or confusing polar form conventions leads to an unsimplified product with an incorrect sign. Express the complex quotient directly as without introducing an extra factor of outside.
Taking as instead of gives the argument difference or miscalculating as . Locate in the second quadrant, which has argument , so .
This is the correct option. The modulus is and the argument is .
Forgetting the modulus entirely and subtracting the arguments in the wrong order or with incorrect signs. Ensure the numerator's modulus is factored in, and subtract the denominator's angle from the numerator's angle.
We are given the complex number .
Express in polar form .
Convert the numerator into Euler's form , observe the denominator is already in Euler's form , and use the quotient rule .
For the numerator: has modulus . The point lies in the second quadrant, so its principal argument is . Thus, .
The denominator is . Dividing gives .
Check quadrants: has angle , denominator has angle . The difference is . Modulus is . Matches Option C.
What is the polar form of the numerator, ?
Dividing by , what is the resulting argument?
Quick checks
Write in standard form as . The real part is negative () and the imaginary part is positive (), which places the number in the second quadrant. The argument is .