Limit of a Finite Sum via Definite Integral
What feels right?
How can the given sum be rewritten in sigma notation with a factor of pulled out?
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
How can the given sum be rewritten in sigma notation with a factor of pulled out?
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
Correct answer
Option analysis
The student correctly converts the limit of the Riemann sum into a definite integral . Correctly expressed the sum in terms of , factored out , and evaluated the resulting definite integral.
The student mistakenly sets the upper integration limit or substitution range incorrectly, evaluating from to or similar, leading to . Identify the running index from to , which gives limits of integration from to .
The student inverts the argument of the logarithm, possibly evaluating as or miscomputing . Evaluate the antiderivative properly at the upper limit minus the lower limit: .
The student takes the limit of each term individually as , getting , and concludes the sum of such terms is 0. Because the number of terms grows with , you cannot distribute the limit across the sum; formulate it as a Riemann sum instead.
The given expression is .
Evaluate the limit as using Riemann sum integration.
Factor out to express the general term as a function of , and convert the Riemann sum into .
.
For finite , . The result matches.
How can the given sum be rewritten in sigma notation with a factor of pulled out?
What definite integral represents ?
What is the value of ?
Quick checks
Because the lower limit is , and the upper limit is .