Higher derivatives of a factored polynomial via closed-form summation
What feels right?
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
Correct answer
Option analysis
Computing instead of , or doubling the second derivative value by mistake. Check signs carefully: the stem asks for , where and , giving , not .
Adding an extra term or miscalculating the summation limits as to instead of , leading to degree terms. The highest power in is , so the polynomial has degree 31, not 32.
Arithmetic error when summing alternating series or pairing terms in the second derivative sum. Carefully compute and , then evaluate .
The student correctly expands the product as a geometric series and differentiates term-by-term at . Correct approach.
.
Compute the value of .
Multiply both sides by to collapse the repeated difference of squares into , then differentiate implicitly twice and evaluate at .
Multiply by : . Differentiating once with respect to yields: .
Differentiate a second time: , which simplifies to .
Substitute : . Dividing both sides by gives .
At , the factor , so . Using the first derivative relation: . From the second derivative relation: . Thus, . Consistent.
Quick checks
Logarithmic differentiation is valid, but at , , which makes undefined at the point. Telescoping polynomial multiplication avoids singularities entirely.