Telescoping Sum of Inverse Tangents
What feels right?
Since , how can the term be decomposed using an inverse trigonometric identity?
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
Since , how can the term be decomposed using an inverse trigonometric identity?
No score. Commit to your first instinct. We’ll show what your mind noticed and what it missed.
Correct answer
Option analysis
Confusing the functions and , incorrectly replacing with . Recall that for , so is not equal to .
Reversing the telescoping order and concurrently substituting for . Keep track of the signs during subtraction: the higher term carries a positive sign, giving .
This is the correct option. Writing the general term as creates a telescoping sum whose first and last terms are and .
Subtracting in reverse order, writing the general term as instead of . Because , the numerator matches , which yields .
are consecutive natural numbers, and the sum to evaluate is .
Evaluate the summation in terms of inverse trigonometric functions.
Rewrite the numerator as in each term so that , yielding a telescoping sum.
For the general term . Summing from to gives .
Test : sum is . From the formula with upper limit : , which perfectly matches.
Since , how can the term be decomposed using an inverse trigonometric identity?
Summing the decomposed terms , which terms survive after cancellation?
Quick checks
Yes, because both and are positive natural numbers, meaning , where the principal identity holds unconditionally.